Curse

Sir Pandra Pierva · Nov 25, 2008, 07:43 PM // 19:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eragon Selene

Legendary Money Waster!!!

For maxing Drunkard, Sweet tooth and Partyanimal

now thats a title i could sign for

ele pl · Nov 25, 2008, 09:27 PM // 21:27

/notsigned at all
The only titles i'd sign is mentioned Title for Quest Completion. And also something like Elite Dungeon Master -> jus tto encourage people for sorrow furnace, tombs and so on. Though a rewarding chest would be enough.

Shayne Hawke · Nov 25, 2008, 09:34 PM // 21:34

Suggestions for titles that are less deserving that current titles aren't worth it. Plus, you're already getting a "reward" for filling out your HoM.

/notsigned

Lady Lozza · Nov 26, 2008, 01:40 AM // 01:40

Being familiar with "achievements" implemented in other games I am not completely against titles, however your logic that people who seek titles must be hypocritical if they don't like yours is flawed.

As many have pointed out already there is no "achievement" in the titles you suggest. The "achievement" titles are the titles most people chase. These titles exist for the completionists (like myself) who like to do everything in a game. Protector, Guardian, Explorer, Vanquisher - these are "achievement" based titles. Like many I would love to see a quest title, if only to help me ensure that I have all quests done.

Title hunters who chase faction titles, are rarer and usually the players who play only on one character. Titles such as party animal and sweet tooth, are money sinks. They are money sinks, but they are easily completeable, and are (after a fashion) fun titles.

The titles you propose are either 1) next to impossible to complete, 2) biased towards some professions, or 3) just plain stupid because the title is based on filling the hall - which is it's own reward.

I just can't sign this based on these factors. If each profession had the same number of elite armours I woulldn't mind a clothes horse title. But they don't, and they never have. As for the rest, you fill a hall, you reap the rewards in GW2, end of story.

crazybanshee · Nov 26, 2008, 02:19 AM // 02:19

LOLNO. Seriously? Another crap title about how much money you spent? Get your GWAMM with the titles they offer, there's more than enough. (and I have every armor set but 1, every hero and pet, almost every destroyer and torment weapon, and almost every statue, so that isn't why I'm against it) I just think it's a poor idea.

Sweet Mystery · Nov 26, 2008, 01:22 PM // 13:22

I just want to know what titles will mean so why ask for more titles and not details?

Shadowmoon · Nov 28, 2008, 02:33 AM // 02:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmakinen

Maxing out Honor is feasible in theory although I find it extremely unlikely that anybody would do it.

28 glad points til r3 glad (waiting for a double weekend)
and r6 hero

got all the other i already got (yes even champ r3), so theres one will do it by gw2.

newbie_of_doom · Nov 28, 2008, 09:04 AM // 09:04

They already count as maxed titles toward the HoM title counter, just not to your charactar itself. This thread is about doing that as well. So it's not a new title, it's naming one.

Div · Nov 28, 2008, 09:44 AM // 09:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmakinen

Maxing out Honor is feasible in theory although I find it extremely unlikely that anybody would do it.

With the exception of the Deep, I think I have every other statue in honor. Suxons.

newbie_of_doom · Nov 29, 2008, 10:57 PM // 22:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowmoon

28 glad points til r3 glad (waiting for a double weekend)
and r6 hero

got all the other i already got (yes even champ r3), so theres one will do it by gw2.

gz on your bought champ title

Quote:

Originally Posted by holymasamune

With the exception of the Deep, I think I have every other statue in honor. Suxons.

wow WE DONT CARE

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azazel The Assassin

This.

If ANY, and I mean any, titles are added, it would be Adventurer for quests completion.

This, is true.